Talk:Admiral Ackbar/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 09:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Shouldn't "Los Angeles Times Syndicate" be in italics? Just asking and do state with reason.
 * The reason I didn't italicize was because this is a news syndication service, as opposed to a publication. The latter would certainly be italicized but I didn't think that a service necessarily would be. However, I see on the Los Angeles Times Syndicate page that it is italicized there, so I've gone ahead and italicized it here as well. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * A wikilink for Daluuj would be good (If it is listed in the list of Star Wars planets).
 * It actually is not included on the list of planets, and based on the criteria outlined at Talk:List of Star Wars planets and moons I'm not sure it meets the informal criteria to be included, hence why I did not wikilink it. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * "a moon-sized superweapon Tarkin is developing" — Shouldn't it be "a moon-sized superweapon Tarkin was developing at the time" since Ackbar had already done it prior to his film debut? Just asking and do state the reason.
 * Good call. I've made this change. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * "an autocratic military dictatorship that formed in place of the original Empire" — Shouldn't it be "an autocratic military dictatorship that was formed from the remnants the original Empire" as the First Order is a derivative of the Galactic Empire?
 * Yes, that wording is much better and more accurate. I've made that change. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

More tomorrow. Looking good so far,.
 * Thanks! —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't find anything much more that needed to be done as far as the prose is concerned. All aspects are quite well analysed. Good job, . Now on to the source review.

That's about it from me. Resolve the remaining comments and the article is promoted. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Sources
 * Reference 43 redirects to a 404 page not found error. Also wikilink The Australian and find out the correct URL or at least the archived version of the presently used URL.
 * Hmm, yes, it seems that link is dead, and Internet Archive didn't turn up a backup. In any event, it was basically just supporting information that was already cited by another source anyway, so I've removed it, along with one basically arbitrary fact from the original sentence. — Hunter Kahn 16:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * In the Bibliography section, add the location of the publishing company of the books and also use the ISBN-13 style instead of ISBN-10. This link can prove useful for the ISBN part.
 * Done. — Hunter Kahn 16:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review! — <b style="color:#C0C0C0">Hun</b><b style="color:#C0C0C0">ter</b> <b style="color:#595454">Ka</b><b style="color:#595454">hn</b> 16:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing the above comments,. Congratulations, the article has passed. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 11:24, 21 July 2019 (UTC)