Talk:Adolf Hitler: My Part in His Downfall

Fair use rationale for Image:Adolfhitlermypartinhisdownfallspikemilligan.PNG
Image:Adolfhitlermypartinhisdownfallspikemilligan.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 05:18, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Adolf Hitler: My Part in His Downfall (book) → Adolf Hitler: My Part in His Downfall – The original book remains significantly better know than the film (in my view a not entirely successful adaptation) so it remains the primary meaning, the film should be a hatnote. PatGallacher (talk) 13:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support - the film is nowhere nearly as notable as the book. Green Giant (talk) 15:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, logical proposal. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comments: Before voting, I must remind you that the film is less viewed than the book, but view difference is not big. --George Ho (talk) 20:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Comedy
Why is this article claimed by the Comedy project? -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Because it is a humourous take on the subject by a renowned comedian. As quoted in the article, Milligan says, in the preface "... therefore, no matter how funny I tried to make this book..." IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)