Talk:Adorama

Unspecified source for Image:Adorama Logo.png
I found Image:Adorama Logo.png and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Adorama Logo.png
Image:Adorama Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality issue?
I'm curious as to why the neutrality tag was readded to this article. Can we get some clarification? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Looks fine to me, since there haven't been any comments in more than a year on this I will remove the tag. A13ean (talk) 20:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

ownership
who owns the adorama chain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.117.11.39 (talk) 22:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Adorama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061022144631/http://www.popphoto.com:80/photoprinters/2697/online-photo-labs-put-to-the-test-adoramapix-dotphoto-page2.html to http://www.popphoto.com/photoprinters/2697/online-photo-labs-put-to-the-test-adoramapix-dotphoto-page2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:30, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Adorama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20050925042020/http://www.forbes.com:80/bow/b2c/review.jhtml?id=6048 to http://www.forbes.com/bow/b2c/review.jhtml?id=6048

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)