Talk:Adorn (song)

Single cover
Is the one on here actually official? It claims lescharts.com as its reference, which in turn claims the cover is (presumably) from a digital promo. Is lescharts.com (or any of the other Hung Medien sites) actually reliable for official artwork? As far as I can tell, the single cover here is just two still-frames from the beginning of the (second) music video shoddily shopped together. As the article already correctly points out, the song wasn't released as a standalone digital single (unless you count the remix); it was first available on the mixtape and originally available for purchase through the preview EP.Mmrsofgreen (talk) 01:17, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Genre
Diff in question; The SoulBounce.com writer's rhetoric of "electro soul slice of niceness" doesnt support electro and soul as genres here. "Electro soul", what the writer uses, is not a genre, but an anachronism, as soul music is rooted musically in gospel, not any electronic music style; contemporary R&B is however, and the Allmusic source I cited supports the genre here being "R&B". This wasnt an unexplained change (check the edit history, 21:08, 20 October 2012‎) Dan56 (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

This is no anachronism. If you look on the electro page, you can even see them mention electro soul. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.181.126 (talk) 05:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for responding. Dan56 (talk) 05:54, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * You made your point, yet this revision doesnt make sense, according to you pointing out "electro-soul", along with the other changes. Dan56 (talk) 06:00, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Music Video
Can someone get an explanation of the music video? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.238.244.243 (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Adorn (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thefader.com/2012/11/16/miguel-second-wind/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://consequenceofsound.net/2012/10/album-review-miguel-kaleidoscope-dream/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allmusic.com/album/kaleidoscope-dream-mw0002413681
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.spin.com/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/164313-miguel-kaleidoscope-dream/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/kaleidoscope-dream-20121005
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://abcnewsradioonline.com/music-news/2013/1/21/miguel-talks-about-kaleidoscope-dreams-sex-driven-moments.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130424132118/http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121014143950/http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/reverb/2012/10/nice_hits_is_a_reverb_17.php to http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/reverb/2012/10/nice_hits_is_a_reverb_17.php
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://social.entertainment.msn.com/music/blogs/expert-witness-blogpost.aspx?post=4ae4a71f-e229-44a9-ae0d-5f3bf53cc93b
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20121030110842/http://www.ariacharts.com.au/news/33225/chartifacts to http://www.ariacharts.com.au/news/33225/chartifacts

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)