Talk:Adrian Roks

Untitled
This article is directly liked to that of John Magno's. It is related to one of Toronto's biggest fires.
 * That may or may not confer notability--I would respect an administrator's findings either way. My interpretation is that the tone is one of advocacy. If the article is written to make a case for the subject's innocence (see WP:soapbox), then much editing would be needed to insure a more objective approach, and inline citations would likely be necessary. JNW (talk) 23:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This article needs to be flagged for cleanup or deletion. The writing style is anecdotal rather than informative and follows an editorial format that contradicts the proper style of an encyclopedia entry. It begins vaguely without describing the crime for which Roks was convicted until well into the main body. Several key subjects of the article are not fully identified (Judge Epstein, Frank and Carlo). The article is incomplete and lacks context. Furthermore, the phrasing and tone of the content conveys significant bias on behalf of its subject. At this time i will make an effort to edit the article removing biased language and fixing some formatting. However, i am in no way connected to this article's subject and can therefore add no additional information without research. This article has been marked for improvement for quite some time and may need to be simply deleted if it does not receive attention. 8 February 2011. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.127.255.232 (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:45, 21 June 2013 (UTC)