Talk:Advantage Business Marketing

Requested move 19 June 2018

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. There is no support for the proposed move at this time. bd2412 T 02:49, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Advantage Business Media → Advantage Business Marketing – Organizational name change LJawor (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dekimasu よ! 16:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Please review Conflict of interest before making further changes to the article and, if necessary, disclose any connection you may have to the subject. As far as the name change is concerned, evidence from reliable, secondary sources that helps establish the common name is needed. Dekimasu よ! 00:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I am an employee of Advantage Business Marketing, and we recently had a name change as evidenced in this press release written by a third party: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/national-media-publisher-pivots-business-model-to-deliver-greater-customer-value-300668767.html?tc=eml_cleartime Apologies in advance if I'm doing this wrong - first time Wikipedia editor here, grateful for all help/patience/assistance. If this is not a sufficient proof of change, what would you recommend? Thanks in advance for any help! LJawor (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)LJawor
 * Thank you for disclosing your connection. Wikipedia titles do not necessarily coincide with official names, unless they are also the name in common use in reliable, independent sources. You wrote that the press release was written by a third party, but the linked page says "news provided by Advantage Business Marketing". (Press releases are mentioned briefly at WP:NEWSORG as examples of sources that may not be treated as independent depending upon the circumstances.) Do other reliable sources call the company "Advantage Business Marketing"? If not, this is not an indication that the page will never be moved to the new title, but that Wikipedia is likely to wait for coverage in outside sources to reflect the new name before changing anything here. Dekimasu よ! 01:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * For the time being, I have created the proposed title as a redirect to the current article. Dekimasu よ! 01:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for your assistance Dekimasu - for now we'll just be patient until third-party coverage can assist. Appreciate your help so much! LJawor (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)LJawor
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Citations review
This is a space to review the quality and appropriateness of the citations used in the article. Though I effectively created and am the most prolific editor on this article, I do see it is of borderline notability when looking at its citations. Please feel free to comment so that we can get to a good consensus on the citation list utility and appropriateness. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Summary

 * Supportive of Notability: Rondon 2014, Silverman2010

--User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)