Talk:Advaxis

this article reads like PR. it should be revised to reflect the standards of a respectable encyclopedia.
 * Yes, it's pretty poor right now. I've tried to do a little of this and I'll try to remember to come back and do some more.  In the meantime, I've flagged it as having an advert-like tone (though it reads more like a press release to a medical journal) and perhaps another editor will come by with some improvments of their own.  Astronaut (talk) 03:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Infobox
Can someone explain why various editors thought it necessary to create Advaxis, Infobox advaxis and Infobox Advaxis when the standard infobox company is more than adaquate for the job? Astronaut (talk) 04:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Advaxis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120926001327/http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/health-care/advaxis-department-homeland-security-agree-cooperative-research-development/ to http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/health-care/advaxis-department-homeland-security-agree-cooperative-research-development/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 09:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Is axalimogene filolisbac the same as ADXS-HPV
says "FDA halts Advaxis Phase 1/2 study of axalimogene filolisbac after patient death" - Is it the ADXS-HPV in the WP article ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:53, 14 March 2018 (UTC)