Talk:Adventure Construction Set

Status of ACS user submitted library of adventures
From email corespondence with Ken St. Andre: "The club ran its course in about 2 years. I kept the library for several years, but without access to the C-64, I finally threw them all away.  As far as I'm concerned it's all gone and finished."


 * Ken's participation in the club lasted only about the first 2 years. The library was then transfered to a 3rd party and the club itself lingered around until 1991-1992. I will try to get more information on who that third party was. --WillDarlock 14:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rivers of Light.jpg
Image:Rivers of Light.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Dates of publication
I've used the copyright dates printed on the various ports' splash-screens to represent the dates of publication. The copyright date listed in the owner's manual, 1984, was also used. However I imagine (but am not certain) that it is possible for the date of a copyright and the date of publication to not be the same. If more solid references can be found for the publication dates, or if a more solid understanding of the relationship between publication and copyright can be established, that would help strengthen the article.

Rashidclark (talk) 20:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)