Talk:Aegidius/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 14:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ;
 * (c) ; and
 * (d).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion
I have changed a few things. Revert any you are not happy with.

Prose comments:
 * "Ricimer ceded Lyons to the Burgundians, and Narbonne and most of Narbonensis Prima to the Visigoths, in exchange for an alliance." Should that be "for alliances", or was that only the case for the Visigoths?
 * "...which gives the narrative of Soissons containing the expansion of the Franks." Apologies, but I really don't know what this is trying to say. (...which shows the expansion of the Franks not extending to Soissons?) It sounds as if "the narrative of Soissons" is a person's title!
 * Believe that is all. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  20:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Believe that is all. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  20:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Believe that is all. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  20:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Coverage comment: I am looking at Mitchell (A History of the Later Roman Empire, 2007) and it gives some minor additional information. If you are ok with it I will pass Coverage and add a sentence when the review is complete. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:59, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds great. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  20:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Additional notes
Gog the Mild (talk) 14:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)