Talk:Aeon (company)

Start
The ÆON entry should stand, subject to further editing, of course. All information in the ÆON page is verifiable. This page was created to replace a misleading link and clear up confusion with AEON language school, an unrelated Japanese company that was incorectly identified as the holding company of JUSCO department store.

External link: link title

This article is only a stub, but a valid one. ÆON is a major corporate entity in SE Asia and merits an article.Manning 14:40, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Name?
The name of the company appears to be Aeon, not Æon. It's just the companys logo that makes the A and E appears like an Æ. See their homepage for reference. Example: "Structural Reform of Aeon’s Financial Service Business " http://www.aeon.info/en/

Agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.16.159.245 (talk) 13:25, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Is this the same AEON corporation that owns Federation Tower in Moscow?
Is this the same AEON corporation that owns Federation Tower in Moscow? (Federation Tower is the tallest building in Russia) If not, then shouldn't there be a sentence noting that it is a different AEON corporation? Thanks in advance to anybody who knows.

Requested move 16 June 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 20:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

AEON (company) → Aeon (company) – I understand that it is stylized in uppercase, but it does not seem appropriate as an article title. Even on the official website, it is not specifically capitalized within English sentences. Akasakamoto (talk) 18:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per MOS:TM. - Station1 (talk) 04:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Note we also have Aeon Motor and Aeon Group, both of which are also companies. I agree with moving away from the capitalisation, but maybe a more specific disambiguator is needed? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * As for Aeon Motor, I think there is less concern about confusion because it is not just Aeon. As for Aeon Group, it shares almost the same content as Aeon (company), and I am considering integrating them myself eventually. Akasakamoto (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)