Talk:Aerial base station

comments
Review as part of GLAM/PoliMi/2020. Hello! I I only fixed some minor typos, otherwise I really liked the article. --Brattak27 (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Review
Hello, I read your article and it provides a very nice view on the topic. The article is very well-written. I corrected only some typos. --Luca Barbieri94 (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Review
I reviewed this article, it is in details about aerial base station, very good article for this topic. Thanks.--Lu Wan (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Observations and suggestions for improvements
The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Tecnology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2020.

Overall, the article is well organized and clear. However, I find it misleading that the notion of ABS is tied to 5G, whereas the two are entirely orthogonal. The idea of using a UAV to extend coverage or improve network performance is not necessarily attached to the use of fo 5G technology. As a matter of fact, several real-world prototypes, including many that are referenced in this article, are not based on 5G. The relation between the two technologies must be clarified.

As a side note, the language is also kind of funky sometimes in the English version of the article.

Majorett (talk) 17:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)