Talk:Aerosteon

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aerosteon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160818172356/https://museumvictoria.com.au/pages/381424/049-061_MMV74_Novas_4_WEB.pdf to https://museumvictoria.com.au/pages/381424/049-061_MMV74_Novas_4_WEB.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081001200522/http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_releases/aerosteon_riocoloradensis_meat_eating_dinosaur_had_bird_like_breathing to http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_releases/aerosteon_riocoloradensis_meat_eating_dinosaur_had_bird_like_breathing

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Plottier Formation Typo - Evidence?
What is the evidence that the Plottier Formation "correction" is a typo? Hendrickx, Tschopp and Ezcurra recently followed it in "Taxonomic identification of isolated theropod teeth: The case of the shed tooth crown associated with Aerosteon (Theropoda: Megaraptora) and the dentition of Abelisauridae". I see it was stated to be a typo by @Meekororum, but where was this determined? I want to clarify since the internet contains many conflicting sources; thanks! Richardhesutton (talk) 08:10, 14 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I thought the Plottier Fm identification was a typo, because in the recent osteology of Aerosteon, the formation is listed again as the Anacleto Formation, which had two authors from the paper that referred it to the "Cañadón Amarillo Formation" (Juan Canale and Fernando Novas), which does not exist. Later papers have cited Novas and colleagues' paper as referring it to the Plottier Formation, but the fact that two of these authors have referred it more recently to the Anacleto Formation leads me to believe it was a typographical error. Meekororum (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I see, makes sense to me! Thanks so much for the clarification. Richardhesutton (talk) 03:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Species Name
Under ICZN rules, the species name is A. riocoloradense, since Greek osteon (and hence the entire compound aerosteon) is neuter gender. N. Pharris (talk) 04:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)