Talk:Aerotel v Telco and Macrossan's application/to do

Areas for expansion
Suggested article sections to be added/modified:


 * History behind the judgment
 * Aerotel v Telco - grant by UK Patent Office
 * Macrossan's application - refusal by UK Patent Office
 * Macrossan's application - refusal by High Court
 * Reception of judgment
 * Can link and summarise commentaries by FFII, IPKat and patent attorneys.
 * UK Patent Office response
 * Needs more detail of their current practice - highlight some recent decisions of the Patent Office?

Please chip in and help where you can. GDallimore 18:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)