Talk:Aetosaur/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I will make straighforward copyedits as I go and jot queries below. Please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I was thinking a link to a wiktionary definition for quadrangular might be worthwhile.


 * ...in the society's quarterly journal - I thought the link was going to be to the specific journal, otherwsie I don't think it is helpful


 * The journal (now called Journal of the Geological Society) currently doesn't have its own article, so I didn't provide a link.


 * para 3 in the History section is a little slim. Given the German find sounds like a valuable one, can it be embellished with a sentence or three?


 * nomen nudum - should be italicised as a foreign (Latin) term (?)


 * Yes, you're right about that. Smokeybjb (talk) 16:53, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - nice work, prose flows very well I find. You intending to take it to FAC? Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That wasn't my original intention, but I might try it out. Thanks for the review! Smokeybjb (talk) 21:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)