Talk:Affective piety/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hasteur (talk · contribs) 12:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Dead links tagged in this rev need to be addressed. Hasteur (talk) 13:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Note, is the article's primary author - I nominated the page on his behalf.  I will be helping out fixing things as desired (I'll go ahead and take care of the dead URLs), but want to give him opportunity to chime in.  He is not a regular Wikipedia, so some patience on the promptness of his replies would be desirable.  Thanks, ThaddeusB (talk) 21:47, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Several factors weighing heavily in favor of this GA candidate in my book. The current list of issues that are holding this up from being a GA are the 1A and 3B categories. While 2A is a personal pain point, it's not enough to sink this GA attempt. Putting back in the court of and  to address the issues. Hasteur (talk) 01:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I just randomly remembered this and will be taking a look at fixing up the problems this week. Sorry for the delay. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Re: 1A--scholars in my field really like this piece as it is. Would you want me to document this approbation? Re: 2A--I'm fine with some rationalization/abbreviation of references. Re: 3B:--Same as 1A MAE (talk) 23:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * scholars in your field can request that it be written in iambic pentameter. I'm saying that as an editor on Wikipedia (and a reader as well) the idea is to have potentially 1 paragraph explaining how the subject has changed with a WP:SPINOUT style page. Rememeber this is considering the average wikipedia user not the scholars in the field. Hasteur (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hasteur, it's been over a month and a half since the above, and the article has not been edited that I can see to address any of your issues. I think it is probably time to close the nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Life has militated against me getting anything done. If the nomination needs to be closed...so be it. Would I be able to request a new nomination once I get the work done? MAE (talk) 22:46, 17 July 2015 (UTC)