Talk:African Auxiliary Pioneer Corps/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 18:36, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Criteria
1. Prose ✅

2. Verifiability ✅

3. Depth of Coverage ✅

4. Neutral ✅

5. Stable ✅

6. Illustrations ✅

7. Miscellaneous ✅

Comments
1. ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
 * "was a unit of the British army" - Should British Army be capitalized?
 * "Allied war effort" - link Allied to Allies of World War II
 * You link shillings, but not pence. Is there a specific reason for this?
 * "Building railroads from Beirut to Haifa, tunneling, loading ammunition onto trains, guarding supplies and working as cooks." - Sentence fragment
 * "5 APC servicemen were killed" - MOS:NUMERALS
 * "2 MBEs, 7 Military Medals, 8 British Empire Medals" - MOS:NUMERALS
 * Lead could use a little expansion.
 * Lede expanded.--Catlemur (talk) 22:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.
 * Is photography really the best way to describe the paintings of the AAPC activities? Looks like they'd be licensed public domain as a painting, too, but it seems like a description of a painting would be better than a description of a photograph.
 * Added "A painting of" to the description of paintings within the article. Would that suffice?--Catlemur (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)


 * - Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I was referring to the licensing information on Commons. Hog Farm (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I removed all the paintings, perhaps I will sort the licensing some other day.--Catlemur (talk) 07:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

7.

Good work. Placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2020 (UTC)