Talk:Afroyim v. Rusk/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Good changes. Thank you for your prompt attention, and excellent work. Racepacket (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well done. Remove bold on case name in footnotes (an artifact of the citation template, beyond our control).
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Explain in background section that § 401(e) of the Nationality Act of 1940 removes citizenship by voting in a foreign election, and that this case challenged the constitutionality of that law.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * no edit wars.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Placing article on hold.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Placing article on hold.