Talk:After Tiller

POV
This article indicates universal praise from critics and completely ignores the firestorm of condemnation from the conservative press. --BenMcLean (talk) 19:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Then what is the "firestorm of condemnation"? Are they Reliable Sources? Could you provide the links here. Cap020570 (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The article does not quote the response from the liberal press, instead choosing (rightly) to describe the responses of film critics to the film as a film. Why do you think it should contain the response from the conservative press? Contrary to the delusions of various figures, including some in the more clueless reaches of the mainstream menu, a neutral point of view and balanced reporting does not mean that one must go out of the way to find people who hate something, if you are accurately reporting that many people like something. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  18:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Nevertheless, there were 6% of negative reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. Some converse opinions are probably needed in the Reception section, perhaps Keith Uhlich's writeup in Time Out or Mike D'Angelo's review from the A.V. Club.  I'll probably exchange them for Lemire's RogerEbert.com review and that of the New York Post (the section is overly long, anyway) in a few hours and remove the neutrality banner if there are no objections.Jg2904 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on After Tiller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130305035510/http://www.thetakeaway.org/2013/jan/17/last-four-doctors-who-perform-third-trimester-abortions/ to http://www.thetakeaway.org/2013/jan/17/last-four-doctors-who-perform-third-trimester-abortions/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012055712/http://www.indiewire.com/survey/top-films-and-performances-of-sundance-2013/best-documentary-feature/ to http://www.indiewire.com/survey/top-films-and-performances-of-sundance-2013/best-documentary-feature/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)