Talk:Ageostrophy

Sentrifugal force
It is bad practice to refer to centrifugal force as if it were a real phenomenon, cf. centripetal force. Furthermore, I question whether the reference is valid anyway, as the "centrifugal" effect is exactly what balances the radial force to create geostrophic movement in the first place (the idealized case). Friction is the essential example of ageostrohpy as far as I can understand, but also external forces (forces other than the one towards the center) affecting the course of the fluid, and non-circular force fields (isobars) implying the existence of such forces. Geir Halbo, 17th May 2015 15:00 EST 90.149.34.81 (talk) 13:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Please confirm classification
The highest WikiProject classification for Ageostrophy is. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 20:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Ageostrophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060909055639/http://www.ems.psu.edu/~young/meteo422/Lecture%2017.htm to http://www.ems.psu.edu/~young/meteo422/Lecture%2017.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC)