Talk:Agnes Irving

Problems

 * 1) Naming convention, why put the year? If there is another Anges Irving, this should be Anges Irving (ship).
 * 2) Obvious that the further reading is a copy and paste job, not tailored to the specific article.
 * 3) Grammar.
 * 4) Unremarkable subject.

22:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

First off, the article is about a ship wreck not a person so why the A7 tag?

Naming conventions for most vessels it is name of the vessel and then the year constructed as this ties back to their registration and removes ambiguity

You also jumped in whilst I was still editing grammar

as to unremarkable subject that is your point of view i.e. are you the arbitrator of what shipwrecks are significant and which ones are not? eg http://www.michaelmcfadyenscuba.info/viewpage.php?page_id=206

Whodidwhat (talk) 22:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I have removed the speedy deletion request. None of the "problems" cited above are reasons for speedy deletion, and boats do not meet the criteria for WP:CSD. Any issues should be tagged for cleanup as needed. -- Kinu t /c  23:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I was under the impression that A7 applied to unremarkable anything. So this falls through the cracks because it isn't a person, group, band, organization, web content, ect.? I am standing by my judgement that this needs to be deleted, but it isn't worth my time to edit war this by putting the tag back up.

Also:
 * 1) My list of problems with the article was indepedant of the CSD.
 * 2) Don't publish things that are not ready to be published. If grammar is poor, fix it, don't publish it.
 * 3) Don't ask me to remove a CSD tag by placing a poorly worded and unsupported request on my talk page. I'm not an admin, so I really can't normally remove CSDs. Furthermore, I find it mildly offensive that you would have the nerve to ask me to back off on a judgment I made without giving me a reason to do so.

05:43, 10 October 2009 (UTC)