Talk:Agnico Eagle

Requesting the name change of the Agnico-Eagle Mining page to remove the hyphen

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Agnico-Eagle Mines → Agnico Eagle Mines Limited – The company has re-branded themselves and their corporate name no longer includes the hyphen between the “Agnico” and “Eagle”. More information and further explanation about the new name is shown on their website here at http://www.agnicoeagle.com/en/About-Us/Pages/Our-Evolving-Identity.aspx. --Relisted. jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Mc.coffin17 (talk) 18:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.



Discussion

 * Any additional comments:

Mc.coffin17 (talk) 18:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Neutrality
A substantial part of this article is PR for the company. Calling its founder a "visionary" is one thing, lapsing into the first person plural is another - this article at one point refers to the company's mining rights as "our resources". Last I checked, "we" don't own Agnico Eagle Mines, so I don't think the company's resources are "ours" in any way. I won't edit it though; it's a great indicator of this article's bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apex Editor (talk • contribs) 22:45, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Technical Language
"Agnico Eagle has full exposure to higher gold prices consistent with its policy of no-forward gold sales."

Is this vague and incredibly technical language really appropriate for an article's lede, especially given there is no further explanation anywhere in the body of the article?  Illini407  talk 20:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)