Talk:Agnostic

Untitled
This article should say the following:

The term agnosticism and the related agnostic were coined by Thomas Henry Huxley in 1869. As Huxley explains it, agnosticism is not about knowledge at all, because nobody can convince the world that he knows there is a god without producing logically satisfactory evidence of a god. According to Huxley, agnostics are simply those who deny and repudiate any doctrine that there are propositions people ought to believe without logically satisfactory evidence.

This is one of the main issuses that still remain concerning agnosticism. The issue is whether there is anything distinctive in being agnostic. When it comes right down to the facts of the matter theists in general do not generally say that they know that a god exists, only that they believe there might be one, and atheists in general do not say they know there is no god, only that they do not believe there might be one. And, as Huxley points out in "Agnosticism and Christianity", agnosticism, in essence, is not really about knowledge at all, since nobody knows, it is about the denial and repudiation of any doctrine that there are propositions people ought to believe without logically satisfactory evidence.

What about other uses of the word?
The word is also used in computer software with another slightly different meaning. See OS_agnostic for example.

Suggested revision
Main article: Agnosticism

Agnostic is a word coined by Thomas Henry Huxley in 1869. from Gk. agnostos "unknown, unknowable," from a- "not" + gnostos "(to be) known.

Agnosticism presumes that the essential nature of things are not and cannot be known. It is usually relates to religious doubt, but is also used in engineering and medicine to indicate that a device is not dependent on any particular technology or condition. See, for example:
 * Fixed-mobile convergence
 * Agnostic alexia - words can be seen but cannot be read — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timpo (talk • contribs) 11:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 19 September 2014
Could the following text:

...please be replaced with the following text:

R fully protected

...so that the redirect is is put into the category via a tranclusion in an Rcat template rather than a category transclusion? Thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 06:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Edit request
I suggest adding these categories:

Attested by M-W, the CED, and the OED. —Ringbang (talk) 19:42, 5 August 2018 (UTC)