Talk:Ahmad Shah

compromise wording...
There were 6 revisions back and forth, over whether Ahmad Shah Khan, merits being listed here as the "Crown Prince of Afghanistan".

I am going to weigh in with my two cents.

Without regard to whether Ahmad Shah Khan is the crown prince, or a pretender, or whatever, since he has an article here on the wikipedia, I wonder why we shouldn't consider him prominent enough to merit an entry on this disambiguation page.

If we can agree that since he has a wikipedia article, he merits an entry, I am wondering how difficult it would be for the entry to be written so that it satisfies everyone. What if it said something like: or
 * Ahmad Shah Khan, eldest surviving son of the last king of Afghanistan.
 * Ahmad Shah Khan, considered by monarchists to be the legitimate heir to the last king of Afghanistan.

Cheers! Geo Swan 04:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm more than happy with both those suggestions as long as he's listed If Beh-nam objects to him being listed as Crown Prince. But he certainly should be listed as this is a disambiguation page for people named Ahmad Shah after all. - dwc lr 21:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)