Talk:Ahmed Yassin

Unnamed votes against UN condemnation
It is strange that in the following quote, it lists 5 arbitrary members who supported the motion, while listing not listing either of the two countries (US and Australia) who voted against.

> supported by votes from 31 countries including the People's Republic of China, India, Indonesia, Russia, and South Africa, with 2 votes against and 18 abstentions

It makes it read as if the 31 countries supporting the motion were the exception, not the rule.

I would write it as follows:

> supported by votes from 31 countries, with 2 votes against from the United States and Australia, and 18 abstentions 144.172.156.217 (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

In my opinion, the only 2 votes against are much more interesting here than the votes in support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.172.156.217 (talk) 00:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 February 2024
Change: > In an interview in 1988 to > In an interview believed to be recorded in the 1990s

This is what the source says, not 1988. Here is the source with a highlight, but the highlight may not work due to translation issues.

https://www.aljazeera.net/amp/blogs/2017/12/18/%D9%81%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%B7%D9%8A%D9%86-%D9%88%D9%88%D9%87%D9%85-%D8%A3%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B9#:~:text=a%20video%20clip%20of%20Sheikh%20Ahmed%20Yassin%2C%20probably%20recorded%20in%20the%201990s%2C 65.130.250.55 (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ M.Bitton (talk) 16:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC)