Talk:Aimée Crocker

Photos
Could someone fix the photos in this article? I am not so experienced at changing/updating/finding photographs. There has to be some out there as she seems quite infamous.Toyz1988 (talk) 22:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

= I really agree, there must be photos of her contemporaries mentioned in the article too. Adam Cuerden is really good at this stuff.

I think Aimee is a very historically significant person, as she lived a life that presaged the future of what women were "allowed" and able to do by 100 years or more. The article as written is charming, but I will attempt to tidy up some of the language, which is not "wiki style", although it appears quoted from a source. If the citations were there, I would leave it.

I wish the front page had a feature article spot for articles on important subjects that need work, not just ones meeting good quality criteria. We have too many beautifully written articles on unimportant people or war battles. To many diamonds in the rough of significant parts of the human experience.

cheers Billyshiverstick (talk) 01:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Well, let's start with the library of Congress - usually a good choice for American subjects.


 * https://www.loc.gov/item/ggb2005015290/ is in the artcile; it's available in much better resolution. It's not a particularly great image, but it has her with one of her husbands, which gives it uniqueness.


 * https://www.loc.gov/item/ggb2005021111/ is probably rejectable.
 * https://www.loc.gov/item/ggb2004006021/ is pretty good.
 * https://www.loc.gov/item/ggb2004006825/ has an advantage fo being unique. Would rather use the painting itself, but it doesn't appear to be publicly available.

I'm inclined to keep the current lead image, and the image of her children; as for the rest.... Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)