Talk:Ainu Revolution Theory

"Ainu Revolution Theory is not a theory of ethnic self-determination originating from the Ainu people."
Shouldn't the explanation of what the topic is start with describe what it is, rather than what it isn't? And even if such an arbitrary blanket statement makes sense in its place and context, shouldn't it be immediately followed up with such an explanation? It may be a difficult subject to explain, but I don't think the approach currently in use helps matters. Bearsca (talk) 23:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I agree. I removed it (after several unsuccessful attempts at trying to rewrite it), I think the history section makes more sense and reads more smoothly without it altogether. Schazjmd   (talk)  23:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)