Talk:AirSea Battle

The Schwartz will be with us always
http://breakingdefense.com/2013/07/16/air-sea-battle-is-more-about-bin-laden-than-beijing-former-csaf-schwartz/

I think The Schwartz is still notable enough to mention. Hcobb (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

http://breakingdefense.com/2013/06/03/dod-document-sheds-first-new-light-on-airsea-battle-warfare-unfettered/

And a media view of the paper. Hcobb (talk) 14:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC) DoD Sheds First Clear Light On AirSea Battle: Warfare Unfettered

amitai etzioni? anyone willing to give an opinion on whether this guy is sufficiently recognized an expert on military affairs so as to include his evaluation of ASB in this and other articles? my sense is that this is somewhat outside his competencies. however, he is evaluating it from more of a social/peacenik perspective, not conducting a detailed military analysis, so maybe it is fine. what do others think? Happy  monsoon  day   18:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

"Background" and "history" sections are kinda the same thing, no?
These two sections are kind of amorphous and overlapping. I don't know what the obvious answer is right now, but something to keep in mind when the article fills out. -- Jprg1966  (talk)  21:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

The "Doctorine" section
Uhm, wouldn't a section that actually describes what the doctorine is be useful, rather just discussing its history, who is coordinating it, and a bit of criticism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.53.6.191 (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)