Talk:Air Evac Lifeteam

Untitled
How is Air Evac Lifeteam not notable? it is one of the singlemost largest providers of Air Ambulance services in the US.--209.213.220.227 (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Then I'm sure there will be a plethora of news sources that can examplify it's notability. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Received plenty of news coverage, is a multi-state organization and also has it's fair share of mentions in Google books. - Marcusmax  ( speak ) 15:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per above-described coverage meeting WP:GNG. Andrea105 (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - operates over 100 aircraft in 14 states, provides most rural EMS in those ares.Very Notable--Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Hell In A Bucket, maybe you should ask yourself how an air ambulance service which operates over 100 helicopters covering 14 states can be considered non-notable, especially as much smaller local services are included on Wikipedia. It should be kept for the same reasons that Air Methods is. IE being the largest and operating the most aircraft.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 18:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

BTW Google has 20,100 hits for Air Evac Lifeteam. See

But try and  and  and  just to start.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

2021 cleanup
This article has been tagged since 2016 as having significant promotional language and relying too heavily on primary or close to primary sources. I've managed to eliminate the majority of the promotional language and have eliminated a number of primary or otherwise inappropriate sources, replacing where possible with independent secondary references. At this point I believe I've eliminated/rewritten enough of the promotional language to remove that tag. The article still needs work, however, on either removing information that does not have an available appropriate source or replacing inappropriate sources with solid ones. Having said that, I'm certainly of the opinion this company is notable given the number of solid independent sources I was able to find with minimal research. But, further work is needed. -- DatraxMada (talk) 19:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)