Talk:Air pollution in Macau

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Air pollution in Macau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604132438/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=12&art_id=24573&sid=5239053&con_type=1&d_str=20051029&sear_year=2005 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=12&art_id=24573&sid=5239053&con_type=1&d_str=20051029&sear_year=2005

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion
Wp:overlap If a page is very short and is unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic. WP:SIZERULE It is obvious that this article is short. There are only four sources cited. One source is an archive, one source is a science paper that cannot be viewed easily, one source is an outdated link. This article is not even 30 kB. I suggest changing the name of "Air Pollution in Hong Kong" to "Air Pollution in Hong Kong and Macau" and merge this article into that article. Take a look at commons:Category:Fog in China, none of the media was taken in Macau. They were either taken in mainland China or Hong Kong. Tony85poon (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose They are 60 km apart. The nom argument is very poor. Two subjects. Johnbod (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)