Talk:Aircraft attitude

Even aside from the introductory joke, this is barely a dictionary entry. Expandable, or should it be deleted?Vicki Rosenzweig 02:46, 30 Oct 2003 (UTC)

seems to have been expanded :) but that aside: I think "Unusual attitudes" is kind of an euphemism? I mean technically it's correct, but unusual is not the best word to headline that paragraph, unfortunately I can't think of a better word right now.
 * avoided? feared? (too emotional) Deelkar 17:24, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

The link to orientation is unfortunate, as none of the available definitions of orientation in WikiPedia is the one intended by the article.

Attitude clothing
What about the clothing company (www.attitude.uk.com)?

Merge with yaw, pitch and roll
Anybody else thinks that both articles should be merged? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.170.46.90 (talk) 13:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Hangon!
Grr! Just discovered that the article I was going to move here is a direct copy of Aircraft_principal_axes with a badly written lead section replacing the original.

This (Aircraft attitude) should actually be changed to a redirect to the Aircraft_principal_axes article.

Sorry about that! --Haruth (talk) 13:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Changed to redirect to the more appropriate location Aircraft principal axes. --Haruth (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)