Talk:Airport & South Line

Untitled
I suggest re-directing the separate articles back, the main article has been re-written and perfectly referenced, clearly no need for duplication. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 23:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I just went over the main article and read over it, actually I'm re-directing it back now. JROBBO just recently did a major re-write and properly referenced the article --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 23:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

AndyZ Peer Review Suggestions
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, JRG 09:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
 * Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.[?]
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
 * There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
 * Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Guide to layout.[?]
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

Stations table
After being accused of being a vandal, I thought I'd raise this here. I think that the large station table on this and other Cityrail pages is too big and directory like for an encyclopaedia page. Would anyone read it? It seems a rehash of information that could easily be found on the official Cityrail website. Thoughts (with civility please)? Endarrt 01:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Most information on Wikipedia is a rehash of information that can be found elsewhere, that is why we reference articles. aliasd·U·T 14:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I have removed the stations table. In my view, Wikipedia is not a timetable. Wikipedia is generally viewed to be not a travel guide - what use is the table to anyone other than intending travellers? And the technical arcana (like ticketing codes) is irrelevant in an encyclopaedia context. TransitPolice 09:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This table and its equivalents elsewhere were found to be fine for Wikipedia - and its equivalents elsewhere have been kept, including, might I say, in a Featured Article. This is staying. JRG 10:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

No, JRG. You can't just dictate that "this is staying". We'll discuss it. For now it can be removed as it is not referenced anywhere but in CityRail's own materials. TransitPolice 10:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This table was fine on the Eastern Suburbs & Illawarra page, and was approved as a Featured Article, and User:Gareth Aus has kindly fixed all the other tables up for us. I'm happy to remove the dots like in the ESIRL page and write a separate section on the stopping patterns, but the rest of it is legitimate and acceptable content. JRG 11:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Separate East Hills line and Airport Link pages
See discussion at Talk:East Hills railway line, Sydney. TransitPolice 09:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The Airport Line page has been merged due to a complete duplication of information. There is in fact nothing on that page that is not a duplication. The page therefore amounts to a POV content fork by Joestella, and as they are undesirable on Wikipedia, it should be deleted or merged into a suitable page. This is a justified redirect. The East Hills line, on the other hand is a justified separate page because of The Fulch's history additions, but we need to fix it up so it acts as a summary style subsidiary spinoff. JRG 22:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Northern railway line, Sydney which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 13:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Airport and East Hills Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://members.ozemail.com.au/~fordghia/transport/EastHill.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721192806/http://cityrail.info/news/2011/110302-access_fee to http://cityrail.info/news/2011/110302-access_fee
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090605184809/http://www.tidc.nsw.gov.au/SectionIndex.aspx?PageID=542 to http://www.tidc.nsw.gov.au/SectionIndex.aspx?PageID=542
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090605191530/http://www.tidc.nsw.gov.au/SectionIndex.aspx?PageID=598 to http://www.tidc.nsw.gov.au/SectionIndex.aspx?PageID=598

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:North Shore, Northern & Western Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)