Talk:Aitch

Consensus to endorse dab page
I noticed that kindly closed the Aitch RfD as "keep," due to a sockpuppet "trolling around." Keeping that result would mean we should be converting it back to a redirect to H. However, I the way the dab page shaped up thanks to, so I thought I'd start a quick discussion to confirm whether or not everyone endorses the dab page. No rationale needed, per WP:NOTBURO; just !vote with either endorse dab page or convert back to redirect.

Cheers,

--Doug Mehus T · C  02:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Whatever you say, . Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Endorse, obvs. Narky Blert (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Endorse. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 11:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Endorse per above, and because I think we have enough separate dab links to separate this from the H dab page. --Doug Mehus T · C  13:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Endorse dab. Thanks all. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak endorse. The DAB page is viable, but it could either live here, or at Aitch (disambiguation) with the redirect retained as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. DMacks (talk) 13:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe true, but I just think that if we have a viable, non-parenthetically qualified article name that's only being used as a little-used redirect, the dab page should be able to live there per WP:COMMONSENSE, WP:IAR, and any other applicable policies that would be better in substantiating the argument than a common sense/IAR endorse, potentially. Doug Mehus T · C  14:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)