Talk:Aitraaz/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 10:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Will review within the next three days.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

I've edited it a bit and it's in pretty good shape overall and passable. However, I really don't think the reception section reads neutrally and seems to be written from Chopra's perspective. If you or somebody like or  could edit it and introduce some quotes on the Kapoor's performance which do exist and neutralize it I'll be happy to pass it.♦  Dr. Blofeld  07:03, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for picking the article, Dr. Blofeld. I would like to tell you that every critic unanimously praised Chopra's performance. And, Kapoor's role was not that much praised. Everyone wrote that she was good in the climax. Despite less praise, I have used two praise worthy comments for Kapoor. If you are not satisfied then, pls go through the reviews. I'm very faithful to the refrences. You won't complain.— Prashant 14:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

It's not just the reviews, it's the way you've worded it which comes across strongly as Chopra POV. First of all you should feature general reviews about the film's content. Then you can mention Chopra was praised and so was Kapoor.♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

You are right. I would definitely add more reviews for films and then performances.— Prashant 02:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

It should be like 75% about the film at least and 25% about the performances. Please reduce the number of Chopra quotes and replace with general ones. A couple of both Chopra and Kapoor is fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld  06:01, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

I have added more text about the film and removed few quotes. I think it's adequate.— Prashant 18:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Currently it's 75% Chopra, 25% film. Should be the other way around. More on the film please and the performances of the others.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:05, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

I'll pass this once more is said about the film generally and a better balance in the reception Perhaps could sort it out.♦  Dr. Blofeld  15:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

and I've already given you a week to neutralize the reception section. If this isn't sorted by the 15th, a full ten days from asking, I'll fail it based on failing "is it neutral". all you have to do is add a few more quotes about the actual film rather than Chopra and it should be OK.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:18, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Currently I'mtravelling, and I think Prashant is experienced enough to write neutrally. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Well, I could have added more about the film but, the problem is that the reviews not have much regarding the film. Any idea? Dr. Blofeld.— Prashant 12:22, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

I've edited it myself, should be OK now.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Looks fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:12, 12 July 2014 (UTC)