Talk:Ajtony/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 09:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Will review. Cheers! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 09:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Fairly well-written as always. Only a few comments: Sainsf  (talk · contribs) 09:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Background
 * When you begin the article, I think it would be a good start to say "AD" though it is evident.
 * I think it is helpful to add something like "churchman" before Regino of Prüm, some readers may not wish to chase links to know who he was.
 * is the subject of scholarly debate I think it should be "a" and not "the"


 * In primary sources
 * "Florin Curta", "county" and "Gerard" are duplinks


 * In modern historiography
 * Who are László Makkai and Alexandru Madgearu?
 * Makkai is mentioned a second time but with his full name, only the last name will do. Likewise for Ioan Aurel Pop and Florin Curta.


 * , thank you for your comprehensive review. Sorry for waiting so long, but I am quite busy in real life now. I made all the changes you suggested above, but I think "county" could remain a duplink (it is a quite special category in the context, and it is linked in the lead for the first time). I must be grateful to for the style of the article, because his/her copyedit highly improved its quality. Borsoka (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Very good. Indeed, I must thank the copyeditor for giving me such a beautiful article to read! I am happy to promote this. Cheers, Sainsf  (talk · contribs) 05:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)