Talk:Akademset

Unreferenced material
I have again reverted the removed the largely unreferenced additions by. Note that the reference named "Tillet" is used 7 times, but undefined. The references "Abbate" and "Kirstein" are both undefined. There's one correctly defined reference in this block which is great, but since the referencing errors are so many, it's easier to remove the material for now until it can be fixed. -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)


 * You have no clue what the article is about and never tried to examine sources, right? You just want to delete large pieces no matter what? I know this behavior very well. It's counter-productive and anti-Wikipedian. No, it's not "easier" to silly destroy work of others. It's very much easier to get rid of your practices of making edit wars and destroying valid content without examining it. DO NOT DELETE VALID WORK OF OTHER USERS and DO NOT MAKE EDIT WARS, they are FORBIDDEN. --ssr (talk) 04:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Please stop re-introducing unreferenced material. -- Mikeblas (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Please stop edit war, please stop disruptive behaviour using (abusing) your admin privileges, and please stop stalking me while still not having any clue about the matter you are involved in editing.
 * You are here not for editing articles. You are here to disrupt and punish random people. Please do it somewhere else, not here. --ssr (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)


 * P. S. I want very much to discuss the article with someone who is able to talk on the topic. Who is able to examine sources. I wish I would be glad to see someone helping me with the article and with sourcing. Nobody so far. And here come you, and I am forced to tell you: CUTTING AWAY HALF OF THE ARTICLE IS NOT A HELP. You are here not to help. Now, go away if you have no clue what the article is about and what the sources say. --ssr (talk) 04:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to examine sources, but you're not providing any. As I described, three of the four sources you're using are undefined, so there's nothing to be examined. If you need help with creating usable references, just ask -- but you'll have to provide information about what it is you intended to reference so that it can be verified, then formatted and added to the article correctly. -- Mikeblas (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * "I'm happy to examine sources, but you're not providing any" -- FALSEHOOD number 3.
 * You still show absolutely no clue in what article is about.
 * You are not talking about the article. You are talking about oppression and harrassment using your administrative status.
 * Let's now talk about the article.
 * Please define in your words what the article is about. Please say something on the subject of the article and do not say anything about "admin", "blocking", "order", "undo". Please answer: what scientific institution was the central node of article's subject? When was this institution formed and when was it closed? Which source mentions these dates?
 * BTW edit war is started by you. You are an admin who make edit wars and stalk and harrass regular users without care about editing sourced articles. The shame of Wikipedia and the main reason of public critics. --ssr (talk) 05:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I've again reverted the un-referenced material. Once your block is lifted, please let me know if you need help resolving the referencing errors before you replace the material. You might consider working on a draft while you add the needed references. Please review WP:CIVIL and WP:ONUS. -- Mikeblas (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)