Talk:Akal n-Iguinawen

Eh?
This certainly seems to fail WP:NOTABILITY and WP:NOT a dictionary. Is there some historical background or importance missing, aside from its tentative connection to Guinea's etymology (which would likewise fail, since that information is already given in a sentence at the appropriate articles)? — LlywelynII  16:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Propose deletion
It seems to me this article is completely included in Guinea (region), which has much more information, and references. Is there any reason to retain it, except as a redirect, or a link in the disambiguation page? Wwheaton (talk) 02:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)