Talk:Al-Aimmah Bridge

Transliterations
AFP: Al-Aaimmah bridge or al-Aaimmah bridge Reuters: the A'imma bridge The New York Times: the Aimma Bridge AP: the al-Aima Bridge BGN: [the?] Jisr al A’immah
 * google maps Aa'mah bridge. It is nonsensical for the English article to begin  "The Al-Aaimmah bridge..." which unnecessarily stutters "the the ..." GregKaye 20:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 3 May 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Number   5  7  20:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Al-Aaimmah bridge → Aa'mah bridge – or Imam's Bridge. There are a variety of transliterations that can be used as presented by above. google maps presents Aa'mah bridge. The translation of the Arabic is Imam's bridge but I haven't seen a source use the translation.

At present the article begins "The Al-Aaimmah bridge'..." which, in the context that we have guidelines on WP:THE, basically reads "The the xxxx bridge...". --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 00:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC) GregKaye 20:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. Predominantly the convention on Wikipedia seems to be to preserve al- while transliterating article titles. Putting al- in titles is also recommended by WP:MOSAR as per its standard transliteration. So the current title seems acceptable per guidelines. Although I guess the double Aa at the start can be changed into a single A, and the B can be capitalized since it is a proper name. We can move to "Al-Aimmah Bridge" per standard transliteration and correct capitalization. Khestwol (talk) 11:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * So move to "Al-Aimmah Bridge". Now, after I fixed it, even the article itself uses "Al-Aimmah Bridge". Khestwol (talk) 11:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page views
Leo1pard (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)