Talk:Al-Khalid/VT-1A/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Prabash.A (talk · contribs) 00:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I will get to this in a moment, as soon as the under construction template goes away I will start the review  Prabash.  Akmeemana   00:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey thanks Prabash! Fai  zan  15:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * As soon as I look down, I see one "citation needed" tag near the bottom, It would be gladly appreciated, if this tag gets replaced with a good reference.
 * References are where they are supposed to be,
 * The article is fleshed out enough, so this looks fine for GA now.  Prabash.  Akmeemana   15:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Great! I will give it a finishing touch tomorrow. Fai  zan  15:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hm, and make sure the article meets all the criteria described below!  Prabash.  Akmeemana   15:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure. Can you get the ticks for the areas in good position, below? Because all I can see are the 'equal signs'. Review it, and get ticks to the good areas in assessment. Fai  zan  16:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay! have done as you pleased!   Prabash.  Akmeemana   17:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Prabash. Things look awesome now. Good to go! Fai  zan  18:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Assessment
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * I will get to this as soon as the issues are fixed!
 * This looks like a good pass, only two issues are currently present, and that is the citation needed tag and the under construction template, once those are gone, I would call it a pass!  Prabash.  Akmeemana   17:29, 24 July 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * This looks like a good pass!  Prabash.  Akmeemana   18:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Result

 * Pass the article passed all of the above GA criteria.  Prabash.  Akmeemana   11:55, 26 July 2013 (UTC)