Talk:Al-Khalid/VT-1A/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I am concerned by the poor sourcing (24 citation needed templates!) and long-term lack of updates. This clearly should never have been promoted. Schierbecker (talk) 02:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

A brief look through the source list reveals a number that are - or appear to be - non-WP:RS self-published/enthusiast sources, like:
 * http://www.china-defense-mashup.com/
 * http://www.military-today.com/
 * http://www.pakistanidefence.com/
 * http://www.sinodefence.com/
 * https://survincity.com/

There's also the mediocre globalsecurity.org, which tends to be a messy aggregator of anything and everything that has ever appeared on a subject.

The article should be rated no higher than B in its current state. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 01:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not sure that the prose is even up to B class. The lead avoids all mention of Pakistan and I found the History section hardly coherent. At which point I gave up. (Sorry.) Gog the Mild (talk) 22:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)