Talk:Al-Mughayyir, Ramallah

General info, not belonging in the article
Presently, there is a lot of general info about areas B and C, which  really belongs in the article West Bank Areas in the Oslo II Accord Cheers,  Huldra (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Guerin, etc.
Finkelstein, p 750 mentions that (Guerin, 1875) described it as mostly deserted. They do not give a full reference, but I assume it refers to Does anyone have the pp for the Guerin-ref? (Or is Finkelstein wrong, again, see Talk:Khirbat Al-Lawz).

Another thing; the village was earlier under Nablus district, today it is under Ramallah. All older statistics for this village must be found under District of Nablus-statisics.

And the Pal-rem-site is wrong about the 1931-population, I have *no* idea as to where they have taken the 204-number from. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 22:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I think maybe the 204 is correct for 1931. See the Nablus Sub-district entry on page 63. Zerotalk 00:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Can't find in Guerin. Is this the Mughaiyir on p292 of Robinson, Later Biblical Researches...in the year 1852? Zerotalk 00:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * You are of course right about the 1931-data. Silly mistake. (the pal.rem site *has* its uses...) I haven´t gone through Guerin in detail for the Samarie-book, yet, it could be there. But Finkelsten normally cites Hutteroth, but has not done so for this place. By the way, is it possible to change the "Infobox Palestinian Authority muni" so we can have the Palestine grid there? After all, both Hutteroth and Finkelsten use it. Yes, this is Robinson, 1852-travel. Nice find. The 1852 and 1882 observations do not fit with Finkelstein`s Guerin-quote  at all. Huldra (talk) 20:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)