Talk:Alaska Department of Fish and Game

Request edit on 18 May 2018
No criticisms section despite such criticisms being objectively reported on by third party media

I can't understand why this page is censored...Who genuinely has the conflict of interest here? The department have been the subject of legitimate and well documented criticism from the scientific community. Pretty rough to not only censor editing, but to also fail to provide balanced information on top of this. Even well respected Wikimedia Foundation staff have criticized Wikipedia for censorship such as this. You might not agree with criticisms expressed and documented by third party sources, but to censor the inclusion of any and all criticisms entirely is surely unjustifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.187.112 (talk) 20:53, 26 May 2018‎ (UTC)


 * I don’t know where you are getting the impression that censorship has occured. The absence of material you believe should be here does not indicate that it was removed or censored. Wikipedia is explicitly not censored, but neither is it complete. If you have reliabe sources documenting the criticism you refer to, please feel free to go right ahead and write such a section. And please don’t cry “censorship” without providing the least shred of any indication of evidence of where and when it took place. It just is not helpful. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2018 (UTC)