Talk:Albania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 15:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

I will review this later today; hopefully it can mark a nomination of yours becoming a GA the same day as my review! --K. Peake 15:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * Infobox looks good!
 * Target Radio Televizioni Shqiptar to RTSH
 * "to compete in the final." → "to compete in the grand final." with the target
 * "In the grand final" → "In the final"

Background

 * Good

Competing entries

 * Good

Semi-finals

 * "featured guest performance from Albanian Elita 5." → "featured a guest performance from Albanian rock band Elita 5." with the target; looks like you were going to finish the introduction to them but forgot
 * Artist → Artist(s)

Final

 * "from Italian Neri per Caso and Swedish Rednex." → "from Italian a cappella group Neri per Caso and Swedish musical group Rednex." since you need to give more introductory info than just their nationalities

At Eurovision

 * Img is a neat addition and it looks good!
 * "and the final on" → "and the grand final on" with the target
 * "in one of the two semi-finals." → "in one of the two."
 * "although Albania was placed" → "with Albania being placed" since this is not in spite of the fact the draw was held for countries
 * Target second to Eurovision Song Contest 2008
 * "it was announced that it" → "it was announced that Albania"

Voting

 * "Albania finished in 17th position," → "Albania finished in 17th place,"

Points awarded to Albania

 * Good

Points awarded by Albania

 * Good

Final comments and verdict

 * until everything is fixed! --K. Peake 17:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I responded to all your comments.--Lorik17 (talk) 17:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Very quick for you to get to it after my review of this article, plus it's been great to see that you have been baring my previous suggestions in mind while preparing these articles for GA status. ✅ now, awesome that this became a GA on the day of my review! --K. Peake 17:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm also looking forward to work with you on other related articles. Thanks for your correctness :)--Lorik17 (talk) 20:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)