Talk:Albert Luykx

Why Accused?
If Luykx was a member of the Waffen-SS and was charged and convicted to 20 years' imprisonment, then why is it necessary to insert accused, per the recent edit? I think he could only get defined as accused former Nazi because of a supposition about his Waffen-SS membership. However, that does not imply membership of the Nazi party, AFAIK. And the success of the Belgian authorities' conviction would eliminate the need for us to state such an accusation, right? But in any case, it's not clear what he was actually convicted of. I suggest changing the text to former Nazi sympathizer. jxm (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Unsourced
I have accessed the Vincent Browne article in the Sunday Business Post (the link in the article is dead), and neither it nor the Dáil debate are the source for 90% of the article. I am removing all the unsourced content i.e. nearly everything. Scolaire (talk) 10:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)