Talk:Albert Moulton Foweraker

&mdash; ßottesiηi  Tell me what's up 03:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Copyvio? No.
From User talk:81.255.41.125

Hi. Your ALBERT MOULTON FOWERAKER article appears to be a cut and paste from http://www.foweraker.com/MoultonFoweraker.htm

If you do have permission from the site owners to post the content to wikipedia, please indicate this on the discussion page associated with the FOWERAKER entry. However for the moment I have listed the article page as a potential copyright violation. You can talk to me about this by leaving a messsage at User talk:Tagishsimon --Tagishsimon.


 * Boy, you guys are quick!


 * I am the editor of the other site. I thought it might be nice to have an article in the Wikipedia. I didn't want to link to the other site because I didn't want to be accused of advertising. All the information on the other site has been sent to me by relatives and collectors of Albert Moulton Fowerakers work, so I am reasonably sure of its authenticity.


 * Top Banana! Thanks for posting the info to Wikipedia. Yes we are quick ... we do deplore copyright violations, but we just LOVE webmasters who post their content to Wikipedia. I'll revert the copyvio notice right away. Many thanks. --Tagishsimon

Without shadow “Foweraker” is moresolilike beautiful than ‘Fouracre’.
Is it okay to byword background info anent the hereinaforeshownabove? 2A00:23C7:2B13:9001:4DD9:395A:783C:26AC (talk) 01:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)