Talk:Alberta Senate nominee elections

Start-class, indeed!
This entry needs a rewrite from top to bottom. There is a lot of hyperbolic bullshit, and scant few facts and refs. I'd delete it, but I don't feel like being bullied again by some jerk with 40,000+ edits (used as proof that I *must* be wrong).

Frankly, is the title even accurate? I'm sure many Albertans think it is, but is an election an election when nobody is actually ELECTED? HuntClubJoe (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

under-represented?
The article says that "Senate reform is popular in Western Canada, where the provinces are under-represented in the House of Commons due to representation by population." But stating that the western provinces are "under-represented" is POV. The residents of those provinces might feel they're under-represented, but the people of Eastern Canada would tend to say that the western provinces have exactly the appropriate level of representation given their lower population. Surely there's a more NPOV way of stating this than what the article currently uses. 207.98.198.84 (talk) 20:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Alberta Senate nominee elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100501000511/http://www.calgaryherald.com:80/news/Alberta+forego+round+Senate+nominee+elections+Stelmach/2965812/story.html to http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Alberta+forego+round+Senate+nominee+elections+Stelmach/2965812/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC)