Talk:Albertaceratops

Untitled
"Medusaceratops" is here mentioned as synonym. As the name however has never been published with an intention of conferring a genus name to a certain fossil, it is not a synonym.--MWAK 10:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It was known as such, though. Should the taxobox mention be removed, then? The place in the article where it is mentioned does not explicitely call it a taxonomic synonym. J. Spencer 14:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Removing the taxobox mention would be best. As it is now, it's ambiguous. Many will at first blush assume it's a junior synonym. Why else would it be in a taxobox? :o).--MWAK 07:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, it's done. J. Spencer 14:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, Mr Nesmo. Your 15 minutes are up.
"The dinosaur's current species' name, A. nesmoi, is derived from the name of Cecil Nesmo, a rancher ..." With all due respect to Mr. Nesmo, it seems unlikely that a separate Wikipedia article on him is merited. -- 201.51.231.176 20:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay. J. Spencer 21:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Medusaceratops
Turns out it's not the same species, after all Pikolas (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albertaceratops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070227122814/http://www.csotonyi.com/Albertaceratops_Rough.html to http://www.csotonyi.com/Albertaceratops_Rough.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)