Talk:Albrecht, Duke of Württemberg

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Albrecht, Duke of Württemberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5kmW8SKCP?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.geocities.com%2Fhenrivanoene%2Fgenwurttemberg5.html to http://www.geocities.com/henrivanoene/genwurttemberg5.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

How was he Crown Prince?h
How was he ever Crown Prince when he was never Heir Apparent? This article itself says he was Heir Presumptive. If at any time the living male to whom this article's subject was Heir Presumptive had become the father of a legitimate male infant, that infant would become Heir Apparent and the subject of this article would no longer be Heir Presumptive. The usual practice is to never bestow an honor or title linked to being an Heir Presumptive, because that title would have to be withdrawn in the event that the person ceases to be Heir Presumptive. (That's not an issue for an Heir Apparent because the only way to cease being Heir Apparent is to die or to take the place of the predecessor when the predecessor dies.) Since somebody else having a legitimate baby would be no misconduct on the part of the Heir Presumptive, no honor should be withdrawn because of that event. (Honors should be withdrawn ONLY because of the holder's misconduct (or death, I guess)). The Wikipedia article on "Crown Prince" doesn't list any possibility for an Heir Presumptive to be a Crown Prince, and, in light of this, I am extremely doubtful that this article's subject was EVER Crown Prince. If I'm wrong and he WAS "Crown Prince", then an explanation should be included in the article because it would be an exceptional case contrary to what we expect a Crown Prince to be.2600:1700:6759:B000:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 01:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Christopher Lawrence Simpson


 * Fixed. 98.248.84.55 (talk) 16:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)