Talk:Alchemy in art and entertainment

[Untitled]
Does the film "The Impatient Alchemist" actually have anything to do with alchemy? It doesn't look like it... Kennard2 02:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

From what I've seen, no. But it does directly refer to Alchemy, so I suppose it's worth a mention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennekox (talk • contribs) 08:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Non-free file problems with File:New Skin for the Old Ceremony.jpg
File:New Skin for the Old Ceremony.jpg is non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:New Skin for the Old Ceremony.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. --  Toshio   Yamaguchi  10:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Peter Pan
In the Peter Pan and the Piratesepisode "Play Ball", Captain Hook keeps a text on alchemy in his personal library. Misinterpreting "bases" as "basis", Hook believes Pan and the Lost Boys to have found the ancient secret of turning lead into gold. --216.163.8.152 (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Little Alchemy
This is an extremely popular game. How is it not on here? ThePRoGaMErGD (talk) 18:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Undue weight given to Harry Potter in Bullet points of 20th Century novels.
In the bullet points that denote novels featuring alchemy in the 20th-21st centuries, the harry potter series is given a simple description, which really serves no purpose. None of the other 22+ bulleted novels have such description, despite being much more obscure to the average reader, or even more focused on alchemy. I'm going to remove the text again, as Harry Potter's connection to alchemy is actually stated in the following few paragraphs. 192.77.12.11 (talk) 10:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, you're entirely right. I didn't sufficiently inspect the article when I made that revert, a symptom of hasty patrolling. Thanks for coming back to this, and sorry for the hassle. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 10:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem at all! sorry if I came off a bit aggressive here. Thanks for the speedy response. 192.77.12.11 (talk) 11:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)