Talk:Alcoa/Archives/2016

Environmental records
This: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcoa#Environmental_record

It's missing this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Brazil

And I suppose every other operation of Alcoa was clean.

Or does that Brazil doesn't count as an environmental nothing? idk, arguments oculd be made, i suppose. But, it too shows where are the company's priorities. It shows that at least, in lack of another point.

Hey, there are good news there too, but you should show all the ball right? --Orangutan45 (talk) 04:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC).

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Alcoa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151019110701/http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=a3bf8be0-6afe-4b1a-936a-5e15fb86f1e4 to http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=a3bf8be0-6afe-4b1a-936a-5e15fb86f1e4
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150919211321/http://www.wkrb13.com/markets/745212/alumina-limited-rating-increased-to-outperform-at-macquarie-awcmy/ to http://www.wkrb13.com/markets/745212/alumina-limited-rating-increased-to-outperform-at-macquarie-awcmy/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)