Talk:Aldwych tube station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Looks reasonable at first glance. I'll start a detailed review as soon as possible. Alzarian16 (talk) 10:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer: Alzarian16 (talk) 10:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Very good overall. A few minor issues, but nothing too substantial.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Maybe a few too many long acronyms, but that's not a big issue.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No issues here. Almost has more sources than it needs in places, e.g. citing the same piece of text to two different issues of the London Gazette in paragraph 2 of Planning.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Generally good. Might be worth adding a screen shot from one of the movies to illustrate the Use in films and television programmes section at some point.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Impressive work, especially considering how it looked a month ago. Well worth GA status. Alzarian16 (talk) 11:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Impressive work, especially considering how it looked a month ago. Well worth GA status. Alzarian16 (talk) 11:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)